Screening is complete and two negotiation clusters are open. The question is no longer only “how far?”—it is which decisions, institutions and reforms can move the country fastest without leaving people behind.
Formal gates are not the same as reform completion.
Completion rates use 2025 normative actions. Counts are always shown because workload differs sharply between clusters.
The pace-setting cluster. Courts, anti-corruption, public administration and public money determine the credibility of the entire process.
An editorial prioritisation layer—not an official EU score. Position combines urgency, system impact and dependency burden.
A curated register of priority commitments—not all 2,898 actions in the national programme. Select any row for ownership, delivery stage, pressure points, impact and primary evidence.
Risk, complexity, impact and “decision needed” are transparent editorial judgements. Government aggregate completion figures are never projected onto an individual action without action-specific evidence.
The Commission’s readiness level and annual progress are separate measures. Neither is converted into a fictional accession percentage.
Monthly evidence should accumulate into quarterly portfolio reviews and the annual EU assessment.
The third intergovernmental conference opened Cluster 6, one month after Fundamentals.
The first cluster opened. It will remain central to the pace of the entire negotiation.
The programme incorporated the 2025 Commission recommendations and new negotiation commitments.
Energy recorded very good progress; fourteen chapters recorded good progress.
The technical examination of Moldova’s alignment across policy fields concluded.
The first integrated national roadmap set 2,898 normative and implementation actions.
The first intergovernmental conference opened the negotiation process.
Readiness and annual progress from the European Commission’s 2025 Moldova Report.
Action delivery from Moldova’s 2025 National Accession Programme progress report.
Priority and bottleneck classifications are transparent working judgements, not official scores.
Named officials and action-level ownership must be time-stamped and checked before publication.